 |
YELLOW SHEET
Office of the State Auditor of Missouri
Claire McCaskill
|
September 30, 2002
Report No. 2002-104
IMPORTANT: The Missouri State Auditor is required by
Missouri law to conduct audits only once every four years in counties, like
Washington, which do not have a county auditor. However, to assist such counties in meeting federal audit
requirements, the State Auditor will also provide a financial and compliance
audit of various county operating funds
every two years. This voluntary
service to Missouri counties can only be provided when state auditing resources
are available and it does not interfere with the State Auditor's constitutional
responsibility of auditing state government.
Once
every four years, the State Auditor's statutory audit will cover additional
areas of county operations, as well as the elected county officials, as
required by Missouri's Constitution.
This
audit of Washington County included additional areas of county operations, as
well as the elected county officials.
The following concerns were noted as part of the audit:
- The county does not
have adequate procedures in place to track federal financial assistance
for the preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal
awards. The county's schedules for
2001 and 2000 contained several errors and omissions. Without an accurate
schedule, federal financial activity may not be audited and reported in
accordance with federal audit requirements, which could result in future
reductions in federal funds.
- Formal budgets were
not prepared for some county funds and disbursements were made in excess
of approved budgets for various funds.
The County Commission's amending of some budgets caused projected
deficit cash balances in those funds.
Documentation was not maintained to support the administrative
service fee transferred from the Special Road and Bridge Fund.
- In prior years, the
County Commission issued several loans to companies and individuals as
part of an economic development program.
Although the agreements indicated there were to be monthly payments
of interest and principal, two companies made no interest or principal
payments during 2000 and only interest payments during 2001. Another company had not made any
payments of interest or principal during the two years and there was some dispute over the
amount remaining unpaid. Because
these monies have not been repaid, the county has less money available for
additional economic development loans.
- A state law, Section
50.333.13, RSMo, enacted in 1997, allowed salary commissioners meeting in
1997 to provide mid-term salary increases for associate county
commissioners elected in 1996 due to the fact that their terms were increased
from two years to four. Based on
this law, in 1998 Washington County's Associate County Commissioners'
salaries were each increased approximately $6,650 yearly.
On May 15, 2001, the Missouri Supreme Court handed
down an opinion that holds that all raises given pursuant to Section 50.333.13,
RSMo, are unconstitutional. Based on
the Supreme Court decision, the raises given to each of the Associate County
Commissioners, totaling approximately $19,950 should be repaid.
- Although the county
has reduced the tax anticipation notes payable, $267,000 is still
outstanding at December 31, 2001.
The county has not had the funds to completely pay off the notes in
one year as required by Section 50.070, RSMo, and have renewed such notes
annually.
- Several problems were
noted regarding the records and procedures of the Washington County
Handicapped Board (also know as the Senate Bill 40 Board) including
incorrect budgets, missing records, pay and benefit concerns, Sunshine Law
compliance, problems with expenditures and contracts, and inadequate fixed
asset records.
- Several problems were
noted regarding the records and procedures of the Health Center including
concerns over receipts and deposits, questionable expenditures, inadequate
fixed asset records, and Sunshine Law compliance.
- Several problems were
noted regarding the records and procedures of the Central Dispatch 911
Board including Sunshine Law compliance, consulting service contracts and
invoices, and documentation of land acquisition.
The audit also includes some recommendations to
improve general fixed assets and property tax controls and procedures. The audit also suggested improvements in
procedures for the Sheriff, County Assessor, Circuit Clerk, Prosecuting
Attorney, Associate Division and Ex Officio Recorder of Deeds.
Complete Audit Report
Missouri State Auditor's Office
moaudit@mail.auditor.state.mo.us
Webmaster: auditor@mail.auditor.state.mo.us