![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
June 13, 2002
Report No. 2002-43
State agency adequately handles most citizen complaints on insurance
companies; some improvements are needed in timeliness and completing case files
The Department of Insurance sufficiently
resolved most of the approximately 500 complaints received each month from
citizens concerning insurance companies and agencies.� This audit focused on ways to improve the effectiveness of the
consumer complaint process.
Untimely actions caused
unnecessary delays
Of the 126 consumer complaints
reviewed by auditors, 80 percent of the files were closed in an average of 33
days, which is under the department goal of 60 days.� However, auditors found 20 percent of the cases took 180 days to
close, with only 2 of these cases having reasonable reasons for remaining
open.� Untimely actions by specialists
and follow up on inadequate responses from companies caused some delays.� Specialists said periodically excessive
workloads contributed to these delays.� (See
page 3)
Better response needed from
insurance companies
Department officials closed 13
percent of the complaints reviewed before receiving adequate responses from
insurance companies.� For five of these
cases, department officials could have assessed penalties for the insufficient
responses.� Some department staff told
auditors it was not their place to question or audit a company�s response. (See
page 4)
Department's penalty is not
effective
Department officials said they
did not always assess penalties because the hearing process was not cost
effective and the $100 penalty did not have enough impact on the companies.
Because raising the fine would require legislative change, department staff are
considering alternatives, such as issuing subpoenas to companies, to ensure
adequate responses are obtained. (See page 5)
Supervisors do not review
files before closure
Supervisors do not review
complaint files before they are closed, which could catch instances of closing
a file before receiving an adequate response from an insurance company.� Instead, the specialist who handles the case
can deem it closed.� In some cases, the
work load is too high to expect review of all cases, but there are also no
written guidelines to assure these complaints are resolved equitably.� (See page 4)