![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
June 28, 2002
Report No. 2002-48
State Medicaid program may pay too much for prescription
drugs and reimburse pharmacies more than
necessary
Missouri’s Medicaid outpatient
prescription drug costs have more than doubled in the last 5 years and totaled
$770 million in fiscal year 2001. This
audit focuses on the Division of Medical Services’ efforts to reduce
prescription drugs costs. Auditors
found Missouri has not been as proactive as other states with certain containment
programs, such as preferred drug lists or prior authorization. The following highlights our findings:
Preferred drug lists help
other states save money
Many states are now following
practices of most employee health insurance plans in using preferred drug lists
to reduce costs. Physicians who want to
prescribe drugs not on the list have to seek prior approval from the Medicaid
program. Michigan and Florida officials
estimate these lists will save annually $80 million and $150 million,
respectively. Legislation just passed
in Missouri’s 2002 session allows the division to establish a preferred drug
list by January 2003, but division officials predict, in the end, the state
rule making process will block its implementation. (See page 5)
State prior authorization rules more complicated then
federal
Division officials have not
placed many drugs in prior authorization status in the last 5 years, partly due
to restrictive state rules which exceed federal requirements. Drugs in this status require a physician
seek Medicaid program approval before dispensing them, which often saves costs
by resulting in fewer unnecessary prescriptions. State rules require Missouri-specific clinical and therapeutic
analysis before placing a drug in prior authorization. Federal law only requires a state plan to
respond within 24 hours of a request and dispense a 72-hour emergency
prescription. In January 2002, division
officials tried to place more drugs in this status, but were blocked from doing
so. (See page 6)
Outdated pharmacy
reimbursement rates raise costs
Each state Medicaid agency
determines how pharmacies are reimbursed for acquiring and dispensing drugs for
Medicaid recipients. One way Missouri
reaches this price is to use the average wholesale price for a drug less 10.43
percent. But Missouri has not changed
this percentage decrease since 1991 and 19 states use a higher percentage
decrease than Missouri. For example, a
Missouri pharmacy would receive a $119.66 reimbursement from Medicaid for a
month’s supply for the 20 milligram version of Prilosecâ, whereas pharmacies in a state with a 14 percent
decrease would receive $115.05 for dispensing the same supply. Overall, if Missouri changed its percentage
decrease from 10.43 percent to 14 percent, division records estimated annual
savings of $16.4 million. (See page 7)
Lower reimbursement rate on
some drugs could save $1.5 million
Missouri pays more than necessary
on 437 drugs dispensed intravenously to at-home or non-hospitalized chronically
ill patients. The overpayment occurs
because division officials have not timely implemented new dispensing fees for
these drugs which would allow providers to be reimbursed using more accurate
drug prices. In May 2000, the federal
government provided more accurate average wholesale prices for these drugs,
with some prices being 80 percent less than previous prices. Our calculations indicate the state could
have saved an estimated $1.5 million ($2 million in drugs costs less $500,000
increase in dispensing fees) on the $8.4 million spent on these drugs in fiscal
year 2001 if the more accurate prices had been used. Division officials believe any costs savings from the more
accurate drug prices would be completely offset by the higher dispensing fees. (See page 9)
State to pay pharmacies the
nation’s highest dispensing fee to offset new tax
Legislation passed in the 2002 session nearly doubled the
dispensing fee paid by the state Medicaid program to pharmacies. The fee increase to $8.04 per prescription
from $4.09 would rank as the nation’s highest.
On average, state Medicaid programs paid a $4.27 fee in 2001. This increase offsets a new 2 percent
pharmacy provider tax, also passed in the 2002 session, which would help the
state obtain additional federal Medicaid matching funds. Pharmacies would pay about $55.4 million
with the new tax, but then receive about $60.4 million from the state in higher
dispensing fees. It is uncertain if the
federal government will agree to match the tax revenues and the state
legislation is not yet signed into law.
(See page 10)
New program director
appears to have conflict of interest
The Department of Social
Services hired a pharmacy program director in October 2001 who previously
worked as a lobbyist for the Missouri Pharmacy Association and continues to own
at least one pharmacy. Department legal
staff determined hiring this person did not violate state conflict of interest laws. However, an appearance of a conflict still
exists because of the director’s continued financial interests in the pharmacy
industry and his new position’s influence over policy or legislative changes
effecting the industry. (See page 15)