![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
January 27, 2004
Report No. 2004-07
Copy machine maintenance costs could be reduced and increased oversight
needed of state computer hardware purchases
The Office of Administration (OA) oversees the statewide contract for copy machine maintenance agreements. These maintenance agreements are priced based on a maximum number of copies per month, referred to as a base level. In addition, OA oversees the prime vendor contract for state purchases of computer hardware and peripheral equipment. Purchases through the prime vendor totaled approximately $26.5 million in fiscal year 2003. This audit focused on copy machine maintenance agreement contracts as well as the contract for state computer hardware and peripherals.
Most maintenance and rental agreements were not
cost-effective due to excessive base levels or non-statewide contracts
Auditors found maintenance and rental agreements were not
cost-effective for 86 percent of the 77 copy
machine agreements reviewed. Of the
contracts reviewed, entities could have saved an estimated $43,900 of the
$108,100 annual maintenance expenditures had more cost-effective agreements
been used for these copy machines. (See
page 3)
Agreements purchased outside
the statewide contract proved more costly
None of the maintenance
agreements purchased outside the statewide contract for the 30 copy machines
reviewed were cost-effective. Entities
could have saved an estimated 57 percent in annual maintenance costs by using
the statewide contract. (See page 4)
Statewide contract did not
offer base level options for all copy machines
In most cases, state
entities paid more for maintenance agreements when the state contract offered
only one base level than if various base levels had been available. Entities could have saved an estimated 48
percent in annual maintenance costs for 11 of 15 copy machines reviewed if
various base levels had been available.
In addition, auditors found agreements for two of three rental copy
machines reviewed had base levels higher than the average actual usage. (See page 5)
Infrequent bidding hindered
competitive prices for computer hardware and peripheral equipment
OA extended the prime vendor
statewide contract for computer hardware and peripheral equipment for almost
seven years without competitive bids and, as a result, did not ensure it
obtained the lowest prices possible.
(See page 8)