![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
March 10, 2004
Report No. 2004-19
The
following problems were discovered as a result of an audit conducted by our
office of the Statewide Advantage for Missouri - Human Resources/Payroll (SAM
II-HR) System.
The
SAM II-HR system was fully implemented by the State of Missouri on April 1,
2001.
We
requested agencies to provide written documentation of their policies or
procedures for segregation of duties between personnel and payroll
functions. Only four of thirty-four
agencies provided written documentation which demonstrated adequately
segregated personnel and payroll functions or allowed for other compensating
management controls when the segregation of duties was not possible. Fifteen agencies indicated they had
implemented procedures to segregate duties but did not have a written policy. Additionally, state agencies are responsible
for preparing internal control plans and submitting the plans to the Office of
Administration (OA). These plans
document an agency's internal control policies and procedures. We reviewed these internal control plans and
noted that nineteen of thirty-four agencies had not submitted a plan as of June
2003. Most of the plans that were
submitted did not provide for an adequate segregation of personnel/payroll
duties.
In converting to the new SAM II-HR system, the state decided to implement a semi-monthly payroll cycle. Because the system calculates pay on the 15th and last day of the month, each pay period covers varying numbers of actual hours. However, to issue pay checks for salaried employees that do not vary in amount, the system assigns a standard number of work hours (86.7) to each pay period. The discrepancy between the 86.7 standard hours and the actual hours in the pay period incurs additional costs in administrative time to process the payroll. This added time and cost could be avoided if the state adopted a bi-weekly pay cycle rather than the current semi-monthly cycle.
The
OA has four non-appropriated bank accounts outside the state treasury to
facilitate processing payments to outside entities for various payroll
deductions. Open items lists were not
prepared and reviewed by supervisors. As
a result, three accounts held funds that should have been disbursed to other
entities in a more timely manner, including $108,000 in the Earnings Tax
account for processing fees withheld from payroll taxes collected on behalf of
local (city) taxing authorities as well as interest earned on the bank balances
between 1999 and 2002. Additionally, the
Deferred Compensation account included approximately $20,000 of interest earned
between 1999 and 2002 that should have been disbursed in a more timely manner. These monies were due to the state's General
Revenue Fund.
Our
report also includes the results of surveys sent to user agencies regarding the
efficiency and effectiveness of the SAM II-HR at the agency level.