 |
YELLOW SHEET
Office of the State Auditor of Missouri
Claire McCaskill
|
Report No. 2004-69
September 15, 2004
The following problems were discovered as a
result of an audit conducted by our office of the City of Independence,
Missouri.
Expenditures from the General Fund have exceeded
revenues in three of the last five years resulting in a decline of the fund
balance. The city's goal is to maintain 5 percent of General Fund annual
revenues in undesignated fund balance to be used for unanticipated and/or
catastrophic events. At June 30, 2003, the undesignated fund balance was
approximately $2.5 million below the city's goal of 5 percent of annual
revenues. While recent monthly financial reports suggest ways to increase the
undesignated fund balance, the city has not developed a plan to restore the
balance in accordance with its policy.
The following, if eliminated or handled
differently, represent discretionary spending or designating of funds that could
have increased the undesignated General Fund balance:
-
The city chooses to earmark unrestricted tax
increment financing (TIF) distribution monies for capital projects. Within
the General Fund, the city designated $1.5 million in TIF distribution monies
to be spent on capital projects during the year ended June 30, 2003.
Additionally, $330,000 in other General Fund monies was transferred from the
General Fund into restricted funds to be used for capital projects.
Therefore, $1.8 million in unrestricted monies used or reserved for capital
improvements could have been available for other purposes or left as
undesignated in the General Fund during the year ended June 30, 2003.
-
The Revolving Public Improvements Fund had a
$235,000 balance at July 1, 2002, of which the city spent $196,000 on capital
projects during the year ended June 30, 2003. This balance consisted of
interest revenue remaining in the fund which was not restricted and could have
been transferred into the General Fund.
-
The city paid approximately $6.8 million from
the General Fund for its portion of employee medical insurance premiums during
the year ended June 30, 2003. The city continues to pay 86 percent of the
total premium costs, despite a recommendation in an actuarial study done in
2000 that the city should increase the portion paid by its employees.
The following concerns were noted regarding the
Stay Well Health Care Plan, which is the city's self-funded medical insurance
plan for employees and retirees:
-
The city has not been meeting the
Council-approved funding goals established for the Stay Well plan, and as of
June 30, 2003, the plan was underfunded by approximately $1.9 million.
Expenditures have exceeded revenues in three of the last five years, resulting
in a decline in the plan's fund balance. While the city prepares annual
analyses to project premium rate increases necessary to fully fund the plan,
full funding is projected to occur three or five years subsequent to the
preparation of these analyses, and the city has not enacted the required rate
increases over these three- or five-year periods to fully fund the plan.
-
The city pays for actuarial studies of the Stay
Well plan. The study performed in March 2000 included nine recommendations
and the city has only implemented two of them.
-
The city could potentially save costs by
dropping its aggregate attachment point reinsurance coverage, which is
coverage when total employee medical claims for the year exceed a specified
dollar limit. The city has never had to use this coverage, and the city spent
$33,000 for such coverage during the year ended June 30, 2003.
-
The city provides a Health Maintenance
Organization (HMO) option to city employees and retirees which costs the city
less per employee/retiree than the Stay Well plan. If every employee/retiree
was enrolled in the HMO, it appears the city could have saved over $1 million
in premium costs during the year ended June 30, 2003. The city should perform
a thorough analysis comparing the costs and benefits of the Stay Well plan to
the costs and benefits of other employee medical insurance plans, including
the HMO option.
The construction of the Santa Fe Trail Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) area has been delayed and no additional development is
expected within the next year. Currently, TIF expenses (bond payments) are
significantly higher than the revenues generated. If additional development is
not started soon, the city will need to use general funds to make the majority
of the remaining debt service payments, which increase significantly during the
latter years of the project and average $921,000 per year through 2023. For the
year ended June 30, 2005, the city estimated $861,000 in available TIF funds;
however, the required debt payments for the year totaled $955,000.
Also included in the report are
recommendations to improve records and procedures for procurement card purchases
and other city expenditures, vehicle and equipment inventory and usage records,
vehicle allowances paid to city officials and employees, and closed council
meeting minutes.
Complete Audit Report
Missouri State Auditor's Office
moaudit@auditor.mo.gov