![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
Report No. 2005-56
August 2005
Parents wait for child support payments while state holds money and does not use all available resources to find parents
This audit reviewed why state officials held child support money owed to custodial and non-custodial parents and did not distribute it as soon as possible. As of February 2005, the state was still holding $2.5 million in payments collected over a 7-year-period ending in 2004. This report is the third audit on how well state officials collect and distribute child support. The following highlights the findings of the most recent audit work.
|
State releases thousands to parents after audit tests |
State officials released $34,000 in
child support due to parents after auditors showed no reason for the
state to continue to hold it. Auditors reviewed 106 cases in which the
state held child support payments for several reasons including: missing
or expired addresses, intercepted tax refunds or payments received
before they were due. (See page 5)
|
![]()
|
$1.7 million held for missing addresses |
Auditors found state officials did not
take appropriate actions to release payments on $116,000 held in 40
child support cases. On $14,000, state officials did not use all
available resources to find correct addresses for custodial parents
before closing the cases. On another $12,000 in open cases, state
officials did not search for new custodial parent addresses. And on
$7,000, state officials only searched for new addresses for a month
before closing the cases. On a number of other cases, errors in case
management were made or state officials had searched for new addresses
for a while, but then closed the cases with monies still on hold. (See
page 10)
|
![]()
|
Other states use address change service to find parents |
Illinois child support collection
officials have used the U.S. Postal Service's automated "address change
service" to forward mail, update changed addresses and remove
undeliverable addresses from their database. (See page 11)
|
![]()
|
Undistributed child support not always top priority |
State officials have not made releasing
held child support a top priority. State officials have not implemented
federal recommendations on ways to reduce undistributed child support,
but instead rely on unreliable automated computer processes or policies
to close particular cases. (See page 14)
|
![]()
|
Electronic support payment cards still not used here |
|